Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,450,437 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.505. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 60.3 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($59,691 compared to $65,518, a difference of 9.8%), per capita income ($48,654 compared to $53,359, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $69,774, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $55,932, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,201 compared to $112,228, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.9%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.3%).