Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,813,174 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $53,359, a difference of 42.1%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $65,518, a difference of 41.7%), and median family income ($87,191 compared to $122,764, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $55,932, a difference of 8.7%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $45,323, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 67.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.4%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.0%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 47.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.18, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 100.5%), no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 92.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.8%).