Fijian vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,044,828 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.290. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.071% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 71.1 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $53,359, a difference of 45.4%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $65,518, a difference of 43.7%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $122,764, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $55,932, a difference of 11.6%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $69,774, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.5%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 146.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 117.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 94.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.62%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.9%).