Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,651,956 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.310. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 9.5 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $53,359, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $65,518, a difference of 27.0%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $122,764, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $55,932, a difference of 6.6%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $45,323, a difference of 16.7%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.7%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.7%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 88.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.1%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 74.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.9%).