Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,389,132 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $44,757, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $62,658, a difference of 7.4%), and median earnings ($49,463 compared to $53,043, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $62,162, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $55,743, a difference of 2.3%), and median household income ($90,907 compared to $94,399, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.080%), family households (63.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 55.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.9%), bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and associate's degree (50.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.63%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).