Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,503,221 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $62,658, a difference of 21.4%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $114,586, a difference of 20.5%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $50,303, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $55,743, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $62,162, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.0%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.1%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.17, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 35.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.1%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.26%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.69%).