Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Belarus

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,988,050 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Belarus.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $50,303, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $62,658, a difference of 29.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $107,393, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 7.7%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $62,162, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $55,743, a difference of 12.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$50,303
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$114,586
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$94,399
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$53,043
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$62,658
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$44,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$55,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$107,393
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$111,430
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Good
$62,162
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Average
25.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.5%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.20%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Good
11.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 71.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
33.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
73.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.45%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
25.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 61.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
16.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
83.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
47.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
15.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
4.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.2%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.4%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Belarus
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%