Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,532,686 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $62,658, a difference of 24.1%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $114,586, a difference of 23.4%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $50,303, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $55,743, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $62,162, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and female unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.7%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.17, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 9.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.6%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.020%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.80%).