Immigrants from Sudan vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,087,757 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to an increase of 116.9 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,109 compared to $107,393, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($51,489 compared to $62,658, a difference of 21.7%), and per capita income ($41,986 compared to $50,303, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,248 compared to $62,162, a difference of 4.9%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($38,511 compared to $44,757, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (60.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 60.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.2%), bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%).