Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,535,333 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.310% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 309.8 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $62,658, a difference of 18.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,171 compared to $107,393, a difference of 17.8%), and median family income ($98,205 compared to $114,586, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $55,743, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $62,162, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 32.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 40.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.6%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%).