Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,216,320 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 35.6 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $44,757, a difference of 7.0%), median earnings ($50,227 compared to $53,043, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $55,743, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,303 compared to $50,303, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($92,094 compared to $94,399, a difference of 2.5%), and median family income ($111,378 compared to $114,586, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.55%), poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.14%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 50.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.4%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and high school diploma (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 34.0%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.010%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%).