Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,367,813 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 32.6 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($69,426 compared to $62,162, a difference of 11.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $111,430, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($99,943 compared to $94,399, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,268 compared to $53,043, a difference of 0.42%), per capita income ($50,555 compared to $50,303, a difference of 0.50%), and median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $62,658, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 50.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and high school diploma (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.8%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.1%).