Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,546,325 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,412 compared to $50,303, a difference of 18.6%), median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $62,658, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $114,586, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $55,743, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $62,162, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.39%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.9%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 41.0%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.29%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 56.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 75.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.5%).