Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,582,756 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $62,162, a difference of 8.7%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $94,399, a difference of 5.9%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($53,310 compared to $53,043, a difference of 0.50%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $62,658, a difference of 0.93%), and per capita income ($49,741 compared to $50,303, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.2%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.27%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 54.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.040%), college, 1 year or more (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.7%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and female disability (11.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.84%).