Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,646,619 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 17.8%), median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $62,658, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $107,393, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $44,757, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $55,743, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $62,162, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 17.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (61.2% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 60.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.3%), bachelor's degree (42.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.56%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%).