Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Belarus
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Belarus
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,085,314 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 43.7 Immigrants from Belarus.
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,303, a difference of 64.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,430, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $94,399, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,743, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $62,162, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $50,303 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $114,586 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $94,399 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $53,043 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $62,658 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $44,757 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $55,743 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $107,393 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $111,430 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Good $62,162 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Average 25.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 115.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 112.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 111.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 53.2%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Good 11.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 153.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 124.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Good 5.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Good 65.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 33.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 124.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 100.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 83.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 47.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 15.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 94.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Excellent 96.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 69.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 52.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 45.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 77.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |