Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Belarus

Poor
Good
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,884,525 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.893. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.306% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 306.5 Immigrants from Belarus.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $50,303, a difference of 52.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $107,393, a difference of 40.9%), and median male earnings ($45,002 compared to $62,658, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $55,743, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $62,162, a difference of 10.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$50,303
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Exceptional
$114,586
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$94,399
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Exceptional
$53,043
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Exceptional
$62,658
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Exceptional
$44,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Exceptional
$55,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Exceptional
$107,393
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Exceptional
$111,430
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Good
$62,162
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Average
25.7%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 85.9%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 66.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 32.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Good
11.5%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 129.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 82.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Good
5.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Tragic
33.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
73.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 125.2%), births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 57.3%), and single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.17, a difference of 8.6%), and family households (69.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
25.6%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 172.8%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 153.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 99.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 99.6%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
16.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
83.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
47.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Tragic
15.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
4.7%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 99.7%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 84.0%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 79.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.0%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.0%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Belarus
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%