Immigrants from Austria vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,984,411 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.203% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 203.1 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,208 compared to $62,162, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $55,743, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($62,164 compared to $62,658, a difference of 0.79%), median household income ($95,277 compared to $94,399, a difference of 0.93%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,103 compared to $107,393, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 21.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 64.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.40%), college, 1 year or more (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%).