Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,346,404 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.642. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 38.5 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $50,303, a difference of 24.4%), median male earnings ($51,594 compared to $62,658, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $114,586, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $55,743, a difference of 6.3%), householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $62,162, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.8%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 2.8%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 64.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 55.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 67.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.8%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.54%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.4%).