Latvian vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,674,242 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 28.6 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,699, a difference of 39.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $88,034, a difference of 36.6%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $47,433, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $48,643, a difference of 8.5%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,930, a difference of 22.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 112.8%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 88.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.2%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.8%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.35, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.9%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 53.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.8%).