Immigrants from Cuba vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,406,991 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $53,232, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $88,034, a difference of 12.5%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $74,847, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $48,643, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,701 compared to $82,355, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 41.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.1%), female poverty (16.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.3%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.2%), births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households (68.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 53.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.8%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.3% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.6%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 10.3%).