Immigrants from Laos vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,589,095 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 43.0 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $53,232, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $88,034, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,857 compared to $37,699, a difference of 0.42%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $35,930, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $48,643, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.9%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 44.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.4%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.35, a difference of 0.29%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.5%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.4%).