Immigrants from Brazil vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,977,231 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $37,699, a difference of 27.8%), median family income ($109,418 compared to $88,034, a difference of 24.3%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $47,433, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $48,643, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $35,930, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $53,232, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 67.3%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.5%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 31.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.35, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.9%).