Immigrants from Fiji vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,705,955 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 35.3 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $82,355, a difference of 26.2%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $74,847, a difference of 25.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $86,764, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $37,699, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $47,433, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 63.8%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 58.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 28.0%), single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and male unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 33.6%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (68.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 70.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 48.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.3%), college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and college, 1 year or more (56.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (95.2% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and master's degree (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.15%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.8%).