Immigrants from Peru vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,013,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 18.1 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,010 compared to $74,847, a difference of 18.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $86,764, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $82,355, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.7%), median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $35,930, a difference of 11.0%), and median earnings ($47,025 compared to $41,474, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 53.3%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 27.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 21.2%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.7%).