Immigrants from Portugal vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,011,233 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 8.2 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.8%), median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $47,433, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,512 compared to $82,355, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $53,232, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $35,930, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $48,643, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 67.4%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.5%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.6%), college, 1 year or more (51.9% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 5th grade (95.9% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 34.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.58%), female disability (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.3%).