Hawaiian vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,068,655 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $53,232, a difference of 22.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $86,764, a difference of 13.9%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $74,847, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $35,930, a difference of 4.4%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $37,699, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $41,474, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 61.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 17.6%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 66.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.6%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (40.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.3%).