Immigrants from Oceania vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,033,292 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $53,232, a difference of 21.0%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $88,034, a difference of 20.9%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $37,699, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $48,643, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $35,930, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.2%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 52.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 27.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 37.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.2%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.1%).