Immigrants from Sweden vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,721,370 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.156% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 1,155.6 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $37,699, a difference of 47.4%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $88,034, a difference of 39.5%), and median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $47,433, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $48,643, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $35,930, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 89.7%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 84.1%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 46.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.2%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.3%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.35, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.69%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 84.5%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 54.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.2%).