Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Central American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Central American Indians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
506
SOCIAL INDEX
2.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
344th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Central American Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,268,130 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 47.8 Central American Indians.
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,643, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,847, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,433, a difference of 0.84%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,232, a difference of 0.94%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,474, a difference of 2.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,699 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $88,034 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $74,847 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,474 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,433 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,930 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,643 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $82,355 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $86,764 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $53,232 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.26%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 22.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 22.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 17.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 25.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 34.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 17.1% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.0% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.1%), currently married (46.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.35 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 39.0% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 69.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 67.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.40%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 93.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 91.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 89.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 86.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 59.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 53.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Central American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Central American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |