Immigrants from Congo vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,548,566 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.245% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 245.3 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $82,355, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $48,643, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $74,847, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $53,232, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $35,930, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 40.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (39.0% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.1%), family households (59.2% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 32.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.75%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.0%), college, under 1 year (61.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.5%).