Immigrants from Guyana vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,239,808 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 23.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $48,643, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $35,930, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $86,764, a difference of 3.9%), median family income ($92,513 compared to $88,034, a difference of 5.1%), and median male earnings ($50,321 compared to $47,433, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 35.6%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (65.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 121.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 22.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 50.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 69.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.5%), no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.5%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.87%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.6%).