Guamanian/Chamorro vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,628,852 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 82.8 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $53,232, a difference of 18.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $86,764, a difference of 16.6%), and median household income ($86,255 compared to $74,847, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $35,930, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $48,643, a difference of 9.8%), and per capita income ($41,678 compared to $37,699, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 68.1%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 16.7%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.7%), family households (66.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 67.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.2%), college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and college, 1 year or more (58.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 33.9%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 2.2%).