Laotian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,698,483 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.229% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 228.8 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $49,862, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $103,111, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($50,343 compared to $50,399, a difference of 0.11%), median family income ($112,859 compared to $112,665, a difference of 0.17%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,154, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.32%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.0%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%).