Immigrants from Switzerland vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,255,527 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Immigrant from Switzerland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Switzerland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.142% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Switzerland corresponds to a decrease of 141.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,866 compared to $49,862, a difference of 10.0%), median family income ($120,726 compared to $112,665, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($63,944 compared to $60,117, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,528 compared to $54,154, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and median household income ($97,979 compared to $93,960, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.8%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.75%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%), family households with children (25.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.29%), married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.3%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Switzerland and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.29%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).