Ethiopian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,273,475 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 21.1 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 23.6%), per capita income ($46,569 compared to $49,862, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $60,117, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $65,246, a difference of 0.39%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $54,154, a difference of 0.62%), and median earnings ($49,572 compared to $50,399, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.31%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.0%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.73%), disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.3%).