Russian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,432,160 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 179.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $103,111, a difference of 7.1%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $112,665, a difference of 6.9%), and per capita income ($53,154 compared to $49,862, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $54,154, a difference of 0.43%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $65,246, a difference of 3.6%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.38%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.58%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.24%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.18%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%).