Ecuadorian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,269,328 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,958 compared to $49,862, a difference of 18.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $65,246, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $112,665, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,154, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $41,952, a difference of 7.2%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,399, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 103.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 14.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 51.2%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.3%).