Chickasaw vs Argentinean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Argentinean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Argentineans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Argentinean Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,886,123 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.665% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 664.6 Argentineans.
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,862, a difference of 36.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,960, a difference of 34.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $110,103, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,154, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,246, a difference of 21.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $112,665 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $93,960 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $50,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $60,117 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,952 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,154 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $103,111 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $110,103 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $65,246 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 42.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 37.5%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Poor 54.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 76.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 63.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 51.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chickasaw vs Argentinean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 71.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Argentinean |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |