Crow vs Argentinean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Argentinean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Argentineans
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Argentinean Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,484,504 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.228% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 227.6 Argentineans.
Crow vs Argentinean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,862, a difference of 57.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $110,103, a difference of 48.3%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $93,960, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,154, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,952, a difference of 19.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $50,399, a difference of 30.2%).
Income Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Exceptional $112,665 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Exceptional $93,960 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Exceptional $50,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Exceptional $60,117 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Exceptional $41,952 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Exceptional $54,154 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Exceptional $103,111 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Exceptional $110,103 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Exceptional $65,246 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Crow vs Argentinean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 101.9%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 95.3%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.8%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.1%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Crow vs Argentinean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 256.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 225.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 219.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Good 5.3% |
Crow vs Argentinean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Tragic 33.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 73.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Crow vs Argentinean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 15.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Crow vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Poor 54.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Crow vs Argentinean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 87.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 71.0%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 63.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 51.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Crow vs Argentinean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Argentinean |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |