Hmong vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,638,478 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.154% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 154.3 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $49,862, a difference of 30.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $110,103, a difference of 24.9%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $60,117, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,154, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $65,246, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.8%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 72.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 40.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.5%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.2%).