Native/Alaskan vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,904,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $49,862, a difference of 49.8%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $112,665, a difference of 39.3%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $93,960, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,154, a difference of 13.5%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $41,952, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 70.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 66.5%), and single male poverty (19.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 59.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.5%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.23, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 100.5%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 83.0%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 63.2%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.8%).