Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,832,655 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 50.7 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $49,862, a difference of 14.7%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $60,117, a difference of 12.9%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $112,665, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $54,154, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $41,952, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $65,246, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.2%).