Hawaiian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,361,394 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $49,862, a difference of 26.5%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $60,117, a difference of 19.1%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $50,399, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $65,246, a difference of 0.50%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $54,154, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.9%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.61%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.9%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 72.1%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 56.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 31.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.5%).