Immigrants from Russia vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 242,079,365 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.357% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 356.5 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $41,952, a difference of 6.5%), median earnings ($53,457 compared to $50,399, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $103,111, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $65,246, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and median household income ($96,378 compared to $93,960, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.4%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%).