Mongolian vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,134,441 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 58.9 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $54,154, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $112,665, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $103,111, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,971 compared to $93,960, a difference of 0.010%), householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $65,246, a difference of 0.12%), and median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $60,117, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.4%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.89%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.9%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.34%).