Arapaho vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,184,162 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.798% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 798.2 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,862, a difference of 54.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $110,103, a difference of 45.0%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $60,117, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $65,246, a difference of 9.9%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,154, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 84.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 51.9%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 163.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 143.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 133.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 57.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.3%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 39.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 106.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 95.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.40%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 60.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%).