Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,411,914 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.4 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $60,117, a difference of 14.7%), median earnings ($57,114 compared to $50,399, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $103,111, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,660 compared to $49,862, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $54,154, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $65,246, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.4%), single female poverty (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 21.5%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.050%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 30.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.81%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.2%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.7%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%).