Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Argentinean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Argentineans
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Argentinean Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,337,762 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 13.6 Argentineans.
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $49,862, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $93,960, a difference of 10.6%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $112,665, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,154, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $65,246, a difference of 7.7%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Exceptional $112,665 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Exceptional $93,960 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Exceptional $50,399 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Exceptional $60,117 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Exceptional $41,952 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Exceptional $54,154 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Exceptional $103,111 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Exceptional $110,103 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Exceptional $65,246 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Excellent 8.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Excellent 12.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Exceptional 18.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Poor 18.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Tragic 33.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Tragic 73.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.3%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.53%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 47.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Exceptional 30.0% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Poor 54.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 40.8%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 63.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 51.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Argentinean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Argentinean |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |