Luxembourger vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Romanians

Excellent
Excellent
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,041,194 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 5.3 Romanians.
Luxembourger Integration in Romanian Communities

Luxembourger vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $60,063, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,632, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $91,994, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $41,663, a difference of 4.4%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $111,243, a difference of 4.8%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.7%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.5%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Good
83.0%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.2%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 104.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.4%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Luxembourger vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Luxembourger vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerRomanian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%